Research Proposal topic about some aspect of Education/Schools and Inequality: hone in on topic and make it more focused. You want to end up with workable and measurable independent and dependent variables for your hypothesis and overall proposal.
Education is a critical component of society. Specifically, education provides a foundation for individuals from low-income households to access better opportunities. From this vantage point, social inequalities and poverty can be effectively eradicated in the community through a combination of federal and state interventions aimed at ensuring an equitable public education system (Van, 2020). Hence, the objective is to eliminate educational inequality, jeopardizing low-income school districts (Bloome et al., 2018). Among the initiatives pursued is the development of improved education policies centered on administering standardized tests. Additionally, the government has implemented improved policies to increase teacher retention, which will aid in the transmission of knowledge and skills to students. Furthermore, a student-centric approach has been adopted, allowing student evaluation programs to identify students’ unique needs and implement appropriate mechanisms for improving outcomes. Despite commendable initiatives in the educational sector, inequality persists and negatively impacts outcomes in low-income school districts. From this perspective, the research topic focuses on how the implementation of educational policies at the district level can improve academic performance and reduce educational inequality by reinvesting funding in low-income schools.
survey of at least 8 close-ended questions which will be asked of participants in your study. This will be the quantitative methods portion of your proposal.
The research proposal will focus on two critical concepts. In this context, there will be the evaluation of authority at the district level and, more specifically, whether investing funds in low-income schools can effectively prevent educational inequality (Owens, 2018). Similarly, another aspect considered during the investigation is the idea’s perception among relevant stakeholders. It is critical to evaluate the opinions and perceptions of sector professionals to determine whether the proposed initiative can effectively reduce educational inequality. A hostile reception may jeopardize the initiative’s long-term success. The following is an outline highlighting the close-ended questions that will be provided during the research:
Survey: Close-ended questions
1) From the options given below, what do you think is the fundamental aspect contributing to educational inequality
a) student and parent preferences regarding various educational facilities within the district
b) social-economic elements such as security and cost of living that may influence the educational performance of students
c) the lack of adequate capital investment in low-income areas that compromises the quality of education
2) If given a chance, reinvestment in schools should be used to facilitate which activities
a) acquisition of school buses and other means of transport
b) improvement of dietary options offered in schools
c) the improvement of knowledge and skills among educators in addition to investment in curriculum-based equipment
3) Should school in low-income districts be given authority regarding investment decision
4) In comparison to high-income school districts, is there limited performance in low-income school districts
5) Among the policies provided, which one will you believe will be effective in addressing educational inequality
a) allowing citizens to invest in the education sector
b) reinvestment of acquired revenue and capital in existing facilities
c) the provision of loans to students
6) What are among the dominant reasons that may lead to poor use of investment resources (Okhremtchouk & Jimenez-Castellanos, 2018)
a) lack of knowledge and skills
b) poor management
c) lack of supervision and oversight
7) What educational responsibility should be given priority regarding spending
a) salaries and wages
c) transportation and food services
8) What elements of candy contribute to educational inequality at the district level
b) different education policies
c) Unequal revenue basis
As previously stated, education is a critical framework in society that fosters growth and advancement. Given the critical nature of education, it is critical to understand the factors that contribute to educational inequality and how the situation can be resolved. Primarily, the research proposal will focus on low-income schools that have become vulnerable to educational inequality. From this perspective, the investigation seeks to provide pertinent information about educational policies that can be pursued to promote an equitable public education system based on reinvesting funding (Bloome et al., 2018). As a result, the investigation seeks to take a comprehensive approach to establish an equitable public education system. The guiding hypothesis is that reinvesting ensures that low-income schools have adequate capital to pursue academic investments thereby reducing inequalities. Hence, progress in the academic sector in low-income school districts can be achieved.
A reputable background and effective data collection methods to ensure objectivity are paramount in the proposed investigation. Decisively, the research proposal will be focused on describing the fundamental problem and providing effective solutions for addressing educational inequality in low-income schools. From this perspective, ensuring effective and accurate data collection is a critical aspect of the proposed research that will allow a thorough understanding of the subject and achieve a better description of concepts (Mkandawire, 2019). Additionally, the research will take a hybrid approach, incorporating quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure that both numerical and numerical data are considered.
The quantitative research method will be critical in collecting numerical data that will allow for an evaluation of the factors that contribute to educational inequality. Additionally, the quantitative research method will provide critical data on how effectively reinvesting funding in low-income school districts can be used to address and reduce educational inequality (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). The quantitative research will be conducted using the survey method. In this context, the research proposal intends to leverage professionals in the educational sector, particularly those from low-income school districts who have a thorough understanding of the problem. Notably, the questionnaires will be distributed online via email to ensure convenience for people from diverse geographical areas who wish to participate in the research. Hence, relevant data from stakeholders will be collected from stakeholders providing an essential framework for the proposed solution.
On the other hand, the qualitative research method will be based on face-to-face interviews with educational professionals and educators who have conducted experiments in school districts (Hawkins, 2018). The rationale for this is that the selected participants will provide a dynamic and explicit understanding of the problem. Additionally, it will be possible to understand the rationale and efficacy of reinvestment funding as an alternative to current interventions and initiatives.
It is worth noting that fundamental aspects were considered before selecting the chosen methods discussed above. Among these factors was the requirement to collect quantitative and qualitative data, which necessitated using a hybrid approach. Additionally, convenient timing and anonymity were considered. In this context, it was necessary to ensure participant convenience, which resulted in a preference for surveys that could be administered through the internet. Moreover, face-to-face interviews provided an excellent framework for understanding the opinions, beliefs, and perceptions of relevant stakeholders regarding educational inequality and how reinvestment funding can be pursued as a solution (Hawkins, 2018). Based on these factors, it is clear that the survey and face-to-face interview will ensure objectivity and effective data collection.
The proposed research places a premium on ethics, and among the ethical issues that may arise due to the survey’s use is the language barrier. Some participants can lack a thorough understanding of the questionnaire’s questions (Brown et al., 2020). The ethical concern may obstruct accurate data collection, thereby impairing the investigation’s results. Similarly, confidentiality concerns the survey approach, as participants have to access the questionnaires via email. It is worth noting that participants’ privacy is a priority maintained throughout the investigation. A different perspective on the ethical concerns surrounding face to face interactions includes the researcher-participant relationship. In some situations, participants may feel uneasy with direct interaction with the researcher. Hence, it is likely that participants can withhold information or provide inaccurate data. Additionally, consent and agreement may raise ethical concerns when some individuals participate involuntarily. Language barrier issues will be addressed following ethical concerns raised by providing multiple language options for the questionnaires. Additionally, confidentiality will be maintained by prohibiting personal email sharing with third-party commercial institutions. The issue of an agreement will be addressed by ensuring that all participants sign a consent form before the face-to-face interviews. Additionally, honesty, integrity, transparency, and professionalism will ensure a positive researcher-participant relationship. Hence, ethical virtues will be the basis for the proposed investigation.
Education is critical to society’s functioning. Education, in particular, sets the framework for low-income persons to pursue better opportunities. Despite commendable educational efforts, inequality remains and negatively impacts student progress in low-income school districts. The study subject analyzes how the district-level implementation of the educational policy might improve academic performance and reduce educational inequality through resource reinvestment in low-income schools. The planned inquiry must have a legitimate foundation and apply competent data collection procedures to ensure neutrality. Decisively, the study proposal will concentrate on defining the root cause of educational disparity in low-income schools and developing viable solutions. The quantitative research technique will be critical for collecting numerical data. On the other side, qualitative research will be conducted through in-depth interviews with educational specialists and educators who have conducted trials in school districts
Bibliography: Use any 8
Bloome, D., Dyer, S., & Zhou, X. (2018). Educational inequality, educational expansion, and intergenerational income persistence in the United States. American Sociological Review, 83(6), 1215-1253. Doi: 10.1177/0003122418809374
Brown, C., Spiro, J., & Quinton, S. (2020). The role of research ethics committees: Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 747-769. Doi: 10.1002/berj.3654
Hawkins, J. E. (2018). The practical utility and suitability of email interviews in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 23(2). Doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3266
Mkandawire, S. B. (2019). Selected common methods and tools for data collection in research. Selected Readings in Education, 2, 143-153. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336617654_Selected_common_methods_and_tools_for_data_collection_in_research_-_Chapter_Nine
Okhremtchouk, I. S., & Jimenez-Castellanos, O. (2018). The Obama Administration American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and Local School Board Politics. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 21(4), 67-85. Doi: 10.1177/1555458918762259
Owens, A. (2018). Income segregation between school districts and inequality in students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 1-27. Doi: 10.1177/0038040717741180
Rutberg, S., & Bouikidis, C. D. (2018). Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 209-213. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328250766_Focusing_on_the_Fundamentals_A_Simplistic_Differentiation_Between_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Research
Van, V. H. (2020). Social responsibility of students: The role and importance of education. Journal of Natural Remedies, 21(8 (1)), 241-254. Retrieved from: https://www.jnronline.com/ojs/index.php/about/article/view/560